Democrats repeat the route of Republicans: they also believed that the post of President in Trump in his pocket.
Demasparty’s candidate (and once even the T.O. President of the United States – while Biden was under anesthesia), Kamal Harris seems to have chosen a candidate for the role of Vice President. Although unofficially.
Everyone expected her step to be similar to the decision of Trump-a failed but logical (78-year-old Trump chose the 39-year-old white weather vane Meid Mena as a younger generation of America, expecting to capture the junior electorate segment). That is, that colored Harris, which at the time of the election is already 60, should find a white young politician, as well as those who made themselves. And also with the calculation on the younger segment of the electorate.
Or at least an experienced policy with steadily high support, with a representative of a difficult state Decarty from key (the same Pennsylvania). But Harris, apparently, also chose 60-year-old Timothy Wolza, a governor of confidently democratic Minnesota. At the same time, if Harris looks entirely 40 on the good days, then the full gray Volz, in fact, will pick up the image of the “All-American Grandpa” in Baiden, because it looks 70-75 for years.
Yes, Volz is a good speaker and feels good to the audience (theoretically, it has to compensate for the usually confusing, fuzzy and with the implicit meaning of Harris’s speech). But most adults do not know him. And a bonus in the form of votes of an unsure state (as 51-year-old David Shapiro) Volz will not bring.
Observers conclude from this that Decarty repeats the path of the Republican Party: those after a confident Trump victory on the debate also believed that the post of President in Trump in his pocket was now now. Then the same conviction arose after the attempt. The public opinion measurements denied the hope every time: Trump gained virtually nothing in terms of votes, the difference with Biden remained within 1%. Accordingly, the choice in favor of Volz is interpreted as the complete confidence of Dempartcia in Harris’s victory – that it does not require additional levers of influence on the mood of the electorate.
At the same time, there is no fundamental difference in the views between Shapiro and Volz – both are moderate politicians. That is, both will affirm the choice of the same moderate Americans. For Harris with her too radical background (for what reason, in the current campaign, she is still maintained from the proclamation of any clear program-and it works on her) both are equally good.
But the radicality of Trump (and Vens) has not gone anywhere. It seems that Democrats simply expect to wait without unnecessary movements for Trump to deprive himself of his voices.
Interestingly, Biden has adhered to a fairly moderate domestic policy. And objectively the standard of living of Americans has improved. Although a subjectively significant proportion of Americans for some reason stubbornly believes that this level has fallen. But Dearthage again offers a couple of “deradical” Harris and moderate Wolz (that is, in fact, demonstrates to the Americans that there will be nothing unexpected after the election, everything will be left like the old good Baiden) – and I am sure that it will lead to success.
